You missed my point. How is denying, or more the point changing the rules, once my application had been taken, the dom delegated, and my money banked, good practice or even acceptable in modern times. And it still continues, or so I am told...I couldn't be bothered any more. The point is too easily lost on people who don't understand the concepts.. And if you think fuck.com.au is offensive or should be censored, just remember, don't watch television after Humphrey goes to bed and you'll hear words like "fuck" mentioned pretty often.. Next you'll be wanting national censorship legislation, and laws to stop any one uploading offensive content..oh sorry we've got them now because some people thought the internet should be decent and controlled.. It's definately stopped the porn spam in my inbox.. LOFL Laughing out fucking loud!! Mike. Tony Owen wrote: >>So does the TALIBAN.. > > > lol, I see your point, ban all forms of censorship ... have no rules > > problem is if the "powers that be" allow fuck.com.au to be officially > sanctioned .... > > then the URL should also be allowed to be printed on the side of buses > then fuck.com.au the book > > without any kind of censorship the book could be distributed in > kindergartens ... > > I used the word decency, not suppression .... put whatever porn you want > behind a URL called adult-entainment.com or something, and password protect > the site, that way people who want to enter can, and nobody is offended. > > Oh, you forgot the argument that everyone else does, so why cant I ... > > > Cheeers Tony > SEOL Internet Providers > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/ > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the > author, further information at the above URL. > >Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:07 UTC