I agree anything that has nothing to do with DNS issues needs to be OFF this
list. Here here. Let's keep petty obsessions off here in the future.

Jason


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Stark" <ronstark&#167;snapsite.com.au>
To: <dns&#167;dotau.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 4:48 PM
Subject: RE: [DNS] Brad Norrish's auDA


> I'm with you, Adam.
>
> Mr Norrish has neither replied to nor answered any rational postings - he
> prefers to be a provocateur.  Innuendo, use of malopropisms, empty
threats,
> uninformed blather and personal attacks are his weapons.
>
> He contributes nothing, apart from giving us all good reason to strengthen
> our Code of Conduct and to alert clients to his business practises.
>
> Henceforth I refuse to descend to his level - any posting that bears his
> name will be deleted without further ado.
>
> Ron Stark
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adam Matthews [mailto:adam&#167;echo-host.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 17 March 2004 5:29 PM
> > To: dns&#167;dotau.org
> > Subject: RE: [DNS] Brad Norrish's auDA
> >
> > Hmm........... I can really feel the intelligence of this
> > list eminating from the walls of my office.
> >
> > Brad, How about you find something better to do than filling
> > up this list full of junk, which serves no purpose whatsoever
> > to what the list is used for.?
> >
> > Sound good? Maybe the IT industry isnt your thing, as your
> > obviously not busy enough to do anything else but accuse
> > innocent users with legal action of voicing their opinion as
> > to what they think of YOU.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Adam Matthews
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Trickey [mailto:jason&#167;mydomain.com.au]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 17 March 2004 4:56 PM
> > To: dns&#167;dotau.org
> > Subject: Re: [DNS] Brad Norrish's auDA
> >
> >
> > Now there's a private email with no reason to be on list.
> > Think before you
> > post at times please. The egos around here are barely fitting
> > into my inbox.
> >
> > Can't we all just have a bbq together sometime and you can
> > fry whomever you
> > like Brad. Lawyers are so boring and use big expensive words.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > -j
> >
> >
> > At 01:37 PM 17/03/2004 +0800, you wrote:
> > >Skeeve
> > >
> > >These cases are particularly expensive to run I've been
> > told, prob $100k
> > for
> > >each party but now with your expert legal advise I can save
> > that cost.
> > >
> > >You are an intelligent man sleeve, I'm sure you can
> > understand even if you
> > >win it will be a year + before you get your costs back, but
> > if you lose
> > I'll
> > >claim my $100k+ out of  your wife's grocery spending budget, any
> > >lawyers/accountants on the list know if that's a tax
> > deduction for skeeve?
> > >
> > > >From your postings its hard to tell whether your a naughty
> > kid who's
> > playing
> > >with fire or a court judge.
> > >
> > >Brad
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------
> > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without
> > permission of the
> > author, further information at the above URL.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------
> > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without
> > permission of the
> > author, further information at the above URL.
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
> author, further information at the above URL.
>
>
>