I'm with you, Adam.

Mr Norrish has neither replied to nor answered any rational postings - he
prefers to be a provocateur.  Innuendo, use of malopropisms, empty threats,
uninformed blather and personal attacks are his weapons.

He contributes nothing, apart from giving us all good reason to strengthen
our Code of Conduct and to alert clients to his business practises.

Henceforth I refuse to descend to his level - any posting that bears his
name will be deleted without further ado.

Ron Stark


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Matthews [mailto:adam§echo-host.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 March 2004 5:29 PM
> To: dns§dotau.org
> Subject: RE: [DNS] Brad Norrish's auDA
> 
> Hmm........... I can really feel the intelligence of this 
> list eminating from the walls of my office. 
> 
> Brad, How about you find something better to do than filling 
> up this list full of junk, which serves no purpose whatsoever 
> to what the list is used for.?
> 
> Sound good? Maybe the IT industry isnt your thing, as your 
> obviously not busy enough to do anything else but accuse 
> innocent users with legal action of voicing their opinion as 
> to what they think of YOU.
> 
> Regards,
>  
> Adam Matthews
>  
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Trickey [mailto:jason§mydomain.com.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 March 2004 4:56 PM
> To: dns§dotau.org
> Subject: Re: [DNS] Brad Norrish's auDA
> 
> 
> Now there's a private email with no reason to be on list. 
> Think before you 
> post at times please. The egos around here are barely fitting 
> into my inbox.
> 
> Can't we all just have a bbq together sometime and you can 
> fry whomever you 
> like Brad. Lawyers are so boring and use big expensive words.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -j
> 
> 
> At 01:37 PM 17/03/2004 +0800, you wrote:
> >Skeeve
> >
> >These cases are particularly expensive to run I've been 
> told, prob $100k
> for
> >each party but now with your expert legal advise I can save 
> that cost.
> >
> >You are an intelligent man sleeve, I'm sure you can 
> understand even if you
> >win it will be a year + before you get your costs back, but 
> if you lose
> I'll
> >claim my $100k+ out of  your wife's grocery spending budget, any
> >lawyers/accountants on the list know if that's a tax 
> deduction for skeeve?
> >
> > >From your postings its hard to tell whether your a naughty 
> kid who's
> playing
> >with fire or a court judge.
> >
> >Brad
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without 
> permission of the 
> author, further information at the above URL.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without 
> permission of the 
> author, further information at the above URL.
>