> No, there are some people and I hope in the majority, who try to make it a
> win/win situation where exploitation and unethical business practices
> don't
> enter into the equation.

When you say unethical, you mean unfair right, because I don't understand
what is unethical about selling the gold nugget I dug up before you did.

> I would take that to mean you would kill another person and feed them up
> as
> well if a cow isn't available.  That sort of thinking is what makes having
> rules and regulations necessary.

Yes I would kill and eat another person if it meant survival, and it was the
only thing, however, I'd first look to the ocean and exploit that first,
it's tastier.

Thank god people like me fell out the trees centuries ago and exploited the
planet to make it easier to live within, so I don't have to kill my own
dinner.

> Some people need protecting from themselves.

OK, now I can see why Jon said what he said, that is ****ing arrogant or
immature you pick one, and you need to look for another game to play,
because this one is only going to disappoint you, or better yet, take all
your money.

> I haven't retired and never intend to.  But then I am not out to make what
> I can and care about others.  

So you plan to exploit people in order to make yourself feel good, and for
the rest of your life? 

So what makes you different? 

> Your view of what 'real world" rules there are is flawed.
> If I took your lead I'd be justified in taking all your money and doing
> whatever
> I wanted.  All the phishing and scams are legitimate under your logic as
> it is
> just taking advantage.  If I can get your banking details out of you by
> whatever means it allows me to clean your account out.

Now that is just immature and completely missing the point, if you actually
had read my response without shooting your mouth off, you would have seen
that law is something I'm emphasising on and that everything I have done is
within the 'real world' laws.

Your logic is pathetic and immature.

> No, it isn't na?ve, I know people can't be relied on to do the right
> thing.
> There are far too many people who think like you do.  Which is why we have
> laws, rules and behaviour modifiers.

Yes it is, and you have proved that in the above paragraph.

Thank god we don't have more people like you, otherwise we'd have too many
sooks and not enough go getters, the country would be screwed, we would have
to import go getters (more so than now).

Thank god people like you are still falling out of the trees.







> -----Original Message-----
> From: dns-bounces+charlie=mccormack.net.au§dotau.org [mailto:dns-
> bounces+charlie=mccormack.net.au§dotau.org] On Behalf Of Darryl (Dassa)
> Lynch
> Sent: Saturday, 15 July 2006 10:31 PM
> To: '.au DNS Discussion List'
> Subject: Re: [DNS] Secondary Market
> 
> 
> |> -----Original Message-----
> |> From: dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org§dotau.org
> |> [mailto:dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org§dotau.org] On Behalf Of
> |> Charlie McCormack
> |> Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 9:35 PM
> |> To: '.au DNS Discussion List'
> |> Subject: Re: [DNS] Secondary Market
> |>
> |> > Nothing wrong with making a profit, but exploiting markets
> |> and doing
> |> > the wrong thing isn't the best way to do so.
> |>
> |> Exploiting markets is what it's all about I'm afraid, there
> |> is no other way, no matter how you justify it, or what way
> |> you like to look at it, you're still exploiting a market
> |> when you try to sell to it, or buy from it, yeah sure we add
> |> fancy words like service and product, but we still are exploiting.
> |>
> |> I'm certain that all parties involved in a sale are only
> |> interested in themselves, and the best deal they can get,
> |> again exploiting the situation, oh right, that's wrong and unethical.
> 
> No, there are some people and I hope in the majority, who try to make it a
> win/win situation where exploitation and unethical business practices
> don't
> enter into the equation.
> 
> |> Wrong? Who say's it is wrong? I'll do whatever it takes to
> |> keep food on the table, whether that be killing a cow (oh
> |> poor cow) or exploiting a market before someone else does,
> |> the same way other companies such as Microsoft, Oracle, etc,
> |> etc did before others did.
> 
> I would take that to mean you would kill another person and feed them up
> as
> well if a cow isn't available.  That sort of thinking is what makes having
> rules and regulations necessary.  Some people need protecting from
> themselves.
> 
> |> > You sound as if you are proud you are breaking the rules
> |> or the spirit
> |> > of the rules.  It is people such as yourself that make
> |> restrictions
> |> > necessary.
> |>
> |> Yes I am proud. It's allowed me to retire at a young age
> |> 30-40. And no I'm not breaking any rules, there are no rules
> |> against this type of trade, or sale, and never will be,
> |> because it goes against our 'real world' laws.
> 
> I haven't retired and never intend to.  But then I am not out to make what
> I
> can and care about others.  I also follow the rules, both those written
> and
> those implied.  Your view of what 'real world" rules there are is flawed.
> If
> I took your lead I'd be justified in taking all your money and doing
> whatever
> I wanted.  All the phishing and scams are legitimate under your logic as
> it is
> just taking advantage.  If I can get your banking details out of you by
> whatever means it allows me to clean your account out.
> 
> |> > If
> |> > everyone could be counted on to do the right thing there
> |> wouldn't be a
> |> > problem.
> |>
> |> Really, that is a really naive thing to say, I'm sure you
> 8|> meant to write that differently.
> 
> No, it isn't na?ve, I know people can't be relied on to do the right
> thing.
> There are far too many people who think like you do.  Which is why we have
> laws, rules and behaviour modifiers.
> 
> |> > Or is that lawyers with a williness to represent any
> |> business without
> |> > delving into the ethics involved?
> |>
> |> LOL, thanks that was funny.
> 
> Glad you got a chuckle out of it.
> 
> Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/