It would be a pity if the list was to finish. Having an independent
pressure group available on tap, if auDA were to start to bring in policies
against the interest of users or suppliers would be invaluable. Kim, if
costs become an issue, let the list know, I'm sure we would all come to the
party.
Norm


On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Kim Davies <kim at cynosure.com.au> wrote:

> Quoting Rod Keys on Wednesday March 26, 2014:
> | Maybe Auda could host it for historical reasons?
>
> To be clear, I have no problem continuing to host it for the foreseeable
> future, or if it was wound up, keeping the archive of historical posts
> online.
>
> I pose the question not because of cost concerns, more a case of
> rationalisation (i.e. having one less thing for all of us to worry
> about) if there was general consensus that the list has outlived its
> usefulness.
>
> In auDA's early years there was a discussion to transfer stewardship of
> the list to them. It seemed like a logical home to me. auDA's position
> was that they didn't want the liability of hosting such a forum and
> therefore it should be kept at arm's length.
>
> kim
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cynosure.com.au/mailman/private/dns/attachments/20140327/de6e40c0/attachment.html>