> Nothing wrong with making a profit, but exploiting markets and doing the
> wrong
> thing isn't the best way to do so.

Exploiting markets is what it's all about I'm afraid, there is no other way,
no matter how you justify it, or what way you like to look at it, you're
still exploiting a market when you try to sell to it, or buy from it, yeah
sure we add fancy words like service and product, but we still are
exploiting.

I'm certain that all parties involved in a sale are only interested in
themselves, and the best deal they can get, again exploiting the situation,
oh right, that's wrong and unethical.

Wrong? Who say's it is wrong? I'll do whatever it takes to keep food on the
table, whether that be killing a cow (oh poor cow) or exploiting a market
before someone else does, the same way other companies such as Microsoft,
Oracle, etc, etc did before others did.

> You sound as if you are proud you are breaking the rules or the spirit of
> the
> rules.  It is people such as yourself that make restrictions necessary.

Yes I am proud. It's allowed me to retire at a young age 30-40. And no I'm
not breaking any rules, there are no rules against this type of trade, or
sale, and never will be, because it goes against our 'real world' laws.

> If
> everyone could be counted on to do the right thing there wouldn't be a
> problem.

Really, that is a really naive thing to say, I'm sure you meant to write
that differently.

> Or is that lawyers with a williness to represent any business without
> delving
> into the ethics involved?

LOL, thanks that was funny.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dns-bounces+charlie=mccormack.net.au§dotau.org [mailto:dns-
> bounces+charlie=mccormack.net.au§dotau.org] On Behalf Of Darryl (Dassa)
> Lynch
> Sent: Saturday, 15 July 2006 8:57 PM
> To: '.au DNS Discussion List'
> Subject: Re: [DNS] Secondary Market
> 
> 
> |> -----Original Message-----
> |> From: dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org§dotau.org
> |> [mailto:dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org§dotau.org] On Behalf Of
> |> Charlie McCormack
> |> Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 6:58 PM
> |> To: '.au DNS Discussion List'
> |> Subject: Re: [DNS] Secondary Market
> |>
> |> > You can read this as to say, No, there are other domain
> |> spaces which
> |> > don't have secondary markets allowed in their policies and
> |> that some
> |> > people disregard the .au policies as they see a secondary
> |> market as a
> |> > means of developing their personal finances.
> |>
> |> Oh yeah god forbid anyone in this industry making a profit.
> 
> Nothing wrong with making a profit, but exploiting markets and doing the
> wrong
> thing isn't the best way to do so.
> 
> |> There are a couple of ways to get around this moronic rule,
> |> such as leasing the domain name to another party, or just
> |> register another business name and transfer it when you sell
> |> the business for the value of the domain name.
> 
> You sound as if you are proud you are breaking the rules or the spirit of
> the
> rules.  It is people such as yourself that make restrictions necessary.
> If
> everyone could be counted on to do the right thing there wouldn't be a
> problem.
> 
> |> I have done this in the past and still do it today, and
> |> there is nothing going to stop me, period. Simply because
> |> there are 'real world' laws that prevent one entity from
> |> restricting another entity in this fashion.
> 
> I assure you, if you continue to break rules and flaunt regulations then
> you
> will be taken to task over it at some point.  Personally, I'd make a point
> of
> never dealing with any company you are associated with and making sure
> people
> I know will not deal with you.
> 
> |> One thing I'd like to know, why has no registrar ever
> |> challenged auDA only appointing 1 registry operator?
> |>
> |> I have only ever really seen one registrar in this industry
> |> with any sort of balls making waves.
> |>
> |> > The policy helps to keep the name space available as intended.
> |>
> |> The internet is a commercial medium now and as such should
> |> be treated as one; the days of Robert Elz, Bob Kummerfeld
> |> and Piers Lauder are gone, past intensions no longer apply.
> |>
> |> In the next 4-6 years we will see a new breed of lawyer come
> |> to play in the industry as they come out of study, a breed
> |> that is not only knowledgeable in the various laws, but also
> |> knowledgeable in I.T
> 
> Or is that lawyers with a williness to represent any business without
> delving
> into the ethics involved?
> 
> Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/